RCRA and Cruise Ships

This is a deep dive into compliance risks faced by cruise ships offloading hazardous waste in US ports.

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulates hazardous waste from “cradle-to-grave” or from the point of generation to ultimate treatment or disposal. The complexities of RCRA compliance can be challenging for companies located at specific geographical points, but it is a far more complicated “ball game” for cruise ships offloading hazardous waste in multiple US ports. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issues identification numbers for hazardous waste generators for cradle-to-grave tracking of the hazardous waste from each unique generator. Each shipment of hazardous waste is detailed in a Manifest that includes the identification numbers for each Transporter of the waste and finally the identification number for the Treatment, Storage or Disposal Facility (TSDF) where the waste reaches its “grave.” If the TSDF does not sign the Manifest within a certain number of days, the Generator is required to follow-up and notify the notify the EPA.

RCRA imposes many regulatory responsibilities on hazardous waste Generators. For foreign flagged vessels, these requirements are triggered when hazardous waste is generated in a US port. Compliance requirements become more or less stringent depending on whether the generator is a Large Quantity Generator (LQG), a Small Quantity Generator (SQG), or a Very Small Quantity Generator (VSQG). Generator status is determined by the quantity of hazardous waste generated in a month. With a large fleet, a management system is essential to remain aware of each ship’s generator status to ensure compliance with the associated requirements.

The compliance requirements, depending on the generator status, can include:

·     Manifests
·     Hazardous Waste Determination Documentation
·     Employee Training Requirements (level depends on generator status)
·     Contingency Plans
·     Emergency Procedures
·     Biennial Reports

To further complicate things, US States can impose more stringent hazardous waste requirements and classify some things as hazardous that are not hazardous under federal law. Keeping up with ever changing State requirements can be challenging.

A robust fleet-wide hazardous waste management system is essential to identify compliance trends, outliers, and understand why some ships are LQGs while similar ships are SQGs or VSQGs. It could also rank your waste categories to facilitate waste management and reduction. EPA provides an online database, RCRAInfo, that can be searched to find public compliance data by ship name such as its reported generator status and the types of hazardous waste it generates.

Compliance with federal and state requirements can be very difficult without a robust management system. There are 3rd party cloud-based systems ready and willing to fill any gaps.

UPDATE

EPA published a proposed rule to eliminate paper hazardous waste manifests. See: Paper Manifest Sunset Rule; Modification of the Hazardous Waste Manifest Regulations. 91 Fed. Reg. 10862 (March 5, 2026)

After the sunset date, only fully electronic or hybrid manifests would be valid. A hybrid manifest is initiated electronically but printed for physical signature by the generator and initial transporter. Official records would no longer be kept in on-site facility files but would instead be maintained within e-Manifest system accounts.

The e-manifest system does not provide automated hazardous waste data aggregation. The system displays lists of individual manifests; however, it does not provide a "corporate dashboard" that sums up waste types across different EPA IDs to show you who is generating the most of each type. The EPA's e-Manifest system cannot automatically rank waste categories, perform trend analysis, or highlight outliers for you. While it captures the necessary raw data at a high level of detail, it lacks the built-in "intelligence" to perform complex comparative analytics.

To effectively govern and management hazardous waste generated by multiple different generator ID numbers, a comprehensive waste management system is still warranted.

Previous
Previous

Greenwashing Compliance Risks

Next
Next

Peach Cobbler Gravel Bike Race